Saradina-Info-Blog
+++ Saradina-Info-Blog! +++
(c)saradinatechnik.de.tl
Why people buy their own #electronic #shackles
saradina-info-blog on 24.03.2024 um 07:55 (UTC) |
| | Imagine that a government or state would decide that all citizens should wear electronic shackles, with which they can be conveniently monitored at every turn. And not only that: With these ankle cuffs you could also find out what they are doing, what they like and who their acquaintances are, what topics they are interested in and much more.
Can you really imagine that? It would really be an expensive project for a state or government to organize and provide the appropriate equipment.
Can you imagine such a dystopia becoming a reality?
You do not need to believe in it or immerse yourself in a fantasy world. This dystopia has been a reality for a long time and ironically, the citizens themselves buy these shackles for expensive money, carry them always with them and are still proud of them.
They are the popular smartphones, which are supposedly indispensable and act as a mirror server of one’s own life - just in the pocket size.
What was initially touted as liberation and independence - and still is today - has developed into a veritable anklet and a portable personal monitoring tool.
It tracks people at every turn, through photos and videos, personal attention to a situation is described, acquaintances in so-called networks and private views and consumer purchases are reported in real time.
Government agencies and corporations are also increasingly accessing this information on a large scale. Moreover, the possession of such an electronic anklet is increasingly becoming a compulsion, an access requirement for various hobby services and increasingly also an access requirement for necessary things such as identity card, Passport and medication and tickets.
Those who do not have such electronic shackles will be excluded from the issue of medication and ticket purchase and other vital things.
What began with mobile phones as freedom is becoming more and more coercive and blackmail.
From the perspective of corporations and governments, generations have grown up with these electronic shackles.
These people experience the electronic ankle restraints disguised as entertainment devices as fun, funny and informative. So no questions and no criticism arise.
How could it come to such a world-wide transformation of societies, where people can be monitored daily, hourly and in every second of their lives comfortably by governments and corporations and buy these monitoring instruments themselves for expensive money?
Quite simply: With the help of colorful balloons.
You profitably sell electronic continuous monitoring devices and tell people something about funny chic trendy entertainment devices, through which they are always connected to the whole world, so to speak permanently online.
These ankle cuffs are decorated with stylish cases and trendy hardware, with colorful software balloons such as photo and video apps and other fun applications.
Then armies are hired by advertising experts and the shackles are sold as a social must-have to the naive people, who are then quite happy to carry a permanent surveillance spy with them, which is garnished with many funny smileys.
Conclusion: Freedom is gradually transformed into slavery and this slavery is sold with great profit of the corporations as freedom including colorful balloons. | | | |
|
For you!
saradina-info-blog on 07.02.2024 um 12:28 (UTC) |
| | For you!
The finder of this letter.
I would like to invite you for a coffee and wish you all the happiness in the world
Have a wonderful day! | | | |
|
Peace, strife and war
saradina-info-blog on 20.11.2023 um 13:00 (UTC) |
| | One person means peace and freedom.
Two people mean arguments and arguments.
Three people means war.
It's a shame, the world could be more beautiful. | | | |
|
Orpheus and Euridike - #Underworld in #sleep #paralysis?
saradina-info-blog on 13.11.2023 um 12:57 (UTC) |
| | The story of Orpheus and Euridike is world-famous and one of the most interesting love stories in world literature.
After Euridike's death, Orpheus goes to the underworld to find his deceased lover.
His experiences in the underworld are partly reminiscent of experiences reported by people who have experienced sleep paralysis.
During his visit to the underworld, Orpheus experiences a kind of colorless shadow world in which there seems to be no landscape or buildings of its own.
It is a colorless and somehow insubstantial place, but where the souls of the deceased reside.
The deceased fit into this environment; they are pale shadow beings.
This idea of the underworld, where the colorless shadows of the deceased reside in an equally colorless and geographically devoid environment, is partly similar to the experiences of sleep paralysis, where those who experience it in their sleep suddenly find themselves in a very strange, insubstantial, colorless and yet very concrete and find an effective environment.
There is a certain horror.
More recently, sleep paralysis has been discovered as a specific form of sleep disorder.
But in the culture of the ancient Greeks, this phenomenon was not yet rationally described.
On the other hand, the ancient Greeks had a rich repertoire of various mental techniques in the context of oracles, divinations and necromancy. According to the story, Orpheus also used these meditative aids in his search for his deceased friend Euridice.
The question now arises as to whether the Greeks possibly had meditative or drug-like means to artificially and deliberately induce the state of sleep paralysis for the purposes of spiritual enlightenment or for the purpose of establishing contact with the deceased?
(C) saradinatechnik.de.tl | | | |
|
Bringing #dead creatures back to life authentically via #genetic engineering?
saradina-info-blog on 03.10.2023 um 08:56 (UTC) |
| | It's not just religions that deal with forms of resurrection and rebirth.
Nowadays, modern science is increasingly interested in bringing extinct creatures back to our time.
Others interested in the concrete resuscitation of deceased living beings using scientific technology are wealthy private individuals who would like to have their beloved pets and family, but also themselves, resurrected after death.
DNA is a blueprint for a type of biological template. The template is specific, for example in terms of formal and functional aspects, but empty in terms of content. This template - like web templates - must be filled with content. Only then does something like personality emerge, something unique.
In biological life, the content is influenced, in addition to the "template", by the influence of the environment, time sequence and events, risks and opportunities. The template is interpreted slightly differently depending on external conditions and the individual's reaction. Certain options are more prominent, others are more likely to be neglected.
The sequence of events. the reaction to it, the experience and behavior form the basis for the unique personality in the form of a biography.
It is questionable whether pure DNA replication can really restore original, faded individual life. DNA replication will use the same template to produce a new, unique, but different entity based on different circumstances and environmental conditions.
There will be no copy of the past, only a similar image, and the quasi-machine reproduction of a past biological existence turns out to be an illusion.
(c) saradinatechnik.de.tl | | | |
|
#Animal #documentaries - #neutral #observers? #Responsibility
saradina-info-blog on 20.09.2023 um 09:17 (UTC) |
| | Documentation serves educational and informational purposes. Neutrality is a quality criterion.
But what if not just facts but situations with living beings are filmed? What if tragic events occur?
When people observe animals in documentaries "neutrally", they reduce the animals to objects and their actions to practical textbook examples.
Humans have a responsibility towards living nature, especially when it comes to endangered animal and plant species.
Nature documentaries often show that wild animals whose populations are dwindling are threatened by natural forces such as drought or flooding.
Due to a lack of food, animal mothers are too weak to provide their young animals with milk or to protect them.
There are valuable and rare young animals such as young elephants or young lions that are in danger of drowning in a great flood.
How neutrally observational can animal documentation be if at the same time one acknowledges the responsibility of humans to preserve and protect endangered nature?
Natural disasters and animal suffering as entertainment and education as part of an animal documentary?
What should be the lesson from animal documentaries in which the helplessness and abandonment of already endangered wild animal species is portrayed as a “natural process”?
It is not without saccharine that it is pointed out that humans as actors have something to do with these "natural" problems, but that's just the way it is and the animals filmed are unnecessarily presented as further animal sacrifices.
The perfidious thing about these animal sacrifices in animal documentaries is that the animals filmed there serve as an instructive example of the consequences of the destruction of nature and thus encourage viewers to become more environmentally aware.
But this double standard does not promote environmental awareness but rather implements the consequences of the destruction of nature as inevitable, and the animals affected and filmed simply have to die.
But unlike the sad animals who are helpless at the mercy of the forces of nature, humans have the necessary intelligence and resources to help.
Film crews for animal documentaries could be better equipped, for example, to get drowning baby animals out of the water or to bring some food to starving mother animals.
It would be better to give at least some of the filmed animals a worthy happy ending.
One could point out that although these affected animals would be doomed to certain death "according to the rules of nature", the well-equipped film crew could at least support some of these poor animals.
Certainly the animals saved by such documentary film crews would not be numerically many. But you have to remember that every life counts, especially when it comes to endangered species.
In addition, the quantitative consideration of animal protection is inadmissible because pure statistics do not do justice to the fact that animals are independent personalities with their own little biographies.
It's not about statistics, it's about helping animals in precarious situations.
The interactive and helpful animal documentation would certainly be a break with the classic "purely observational" documentation.
But traditions must always be critically reconsidered and, if necessary, sensibly adapted.
Recent research has made it clear that higher mammals, for example, have their own experiences and behavior and perceive fear and pain.
Therefore, responsible, active, interventional animal documentation is the only sensible alternative for the future.
(c)saradinatechnik.de.tl | | | |
|
