Saradina-Info-Blog
+++ Saradina-Info-Blog! +++
(c)saradinatechnik.de.tl
tears #psychology
saradina-info-blog on 22.08.2022 um 20:04 (UTC) |
|
Novel #drugs only because of #patent advantages?
saradina-info-blog on 01.08.2022 um 13:16 (UTC) |
| | In recent times, more and more completely new drugs with "revolutionary concepts" are coming onto the market.
Unfortunately, these drugs don't seem to help well or not at all.
These drugs include mRNA products on the one hand and a remedy for Alzheimer's disease on the other, which was initially only tested on rodents.
Although both drugs are useless - and in the case of mRNA substances also fraught with serious side effects - the population was encouraged to use these useless drugs, and in the case of the m-RNA substance even forced by the state to use them.
But why all these dangerous and useless experiments on humans? Especially in the field of vaccinations, where there are proven and functioning concepts?
A plausible explanation for this process could have to do with money and profit. Because the proven old drugs and their concepts have a serious disadvantage from an economic point of view.
Many of these old types of drugs are no longer subject to a patent and any company in the world can produce, market and sell them infinitely.
There is no longer a patent for these proven substances and this makes these substances unattractive from the point of view of pharmaceutical companies.
However, the novel drugs are all subject to a patent and so the pharmaceutical companies that hold the patents can charge any price they want to receive. You can simply dictate the price without the pressure of competition.
And that's why lobbies sacrifice millions of patients on the altar of profit and accept the uselessness and side effects of the novel drugs with a cold smile.
(c)saradinatechnik.de.tl | | | |
|
Do pride and #prejudice hinder the acquisition of #knowledge in #research?
saradina-info-blog on 23.07.2022 um 18:22 (UTC) |
| | Knowledge is the key to progress. But what if certain questions are taboo?
And what if people who report on unusual things that have not yet been documented in any book or scientific work are not taken seriously or are even generally dismissed as weirdos?
Issues that have not yet been well documented are considered suspect and the rapporteurs, who are often scientific laymen, are also described as suspect.
Recently, there have been more and more examples in which different people have reported extraordinary phenomena at different times and in different places, but have not been taken seriously for a long time because there has not yet been solid research on the subject.
At this point, there are three examples that illustrate how reports from the population were initially regarded as crazy for a long time, but have now gradually become "socially acceptable" on a scientific level.
The first example is the topic of "monster wave" or "giant wave". For a long time, sailors had reported on so-called monster waves, which were over 20 meters high and even large ships had sunk. They were horrific sea accidents.
But no one believed the sailors, because there was a scientific opinion that waves in the sea could never get higher than 12 meters. This opinion was so strong that sailors were not taken seriously as eyewitnesses.
Only when oil platform Draupner was confronted with a giant wave of 25 meters in height on the oil platform was the giant wave documented acceptably for science.
Another case is the issue of sleep paralysis. It is a condition in which people feel awake during sleep and on the other hand no longer have any influence on their body. It is perceived by most people as spooky and sleep disorders can develop as the affected persons are afraid to fall asleep.
People who reported their experiences before the discovery of sleep paralysis were considered weirdos.
It wasn't until sleep paralysis was found by science that people who had these experiences were taken seriously.
Another very well-known example is the topic of UFOs. No one who wanted to talk about UFOs in past decades was taken seriously. In the best case, you were laughed at. Scientists interested in the topic risked their careers. However, a lot has changed recently. Governments start observation programs, scientists at renowned universities publish essays, and a university is looking for a research assistant on the subject of UFOs.
A rather funny example was the firm scientific doctrine that spinach contains a lot of iron. For years, this opinion was passed down until it turned out that it was simply a misprinted number. However, this number was scientifically respected because it was somewhere in some book and continued to be copied.
Looking at these examples, one wonders whether the scientific world is really genuinely knowledge-oriented, or whether it is a kind of high priesthood that turns doctrines into inviolable beliefs and in which dissenting opinions are regarded as heresy.
(c)saradinatechnik.de.tl | | | |
|
PCR tests DNA, paternity tests #health
saradina-info-blog on 23.03.2022 um 08:56 (UTC) |
| | PCR tests are the popular standard for corona disease.
But some people are suspicious and suspect that human DNA material could be collected through these tests. But is it even possible to obtain DNA material through PCR tests?
If you research, you will find that PCR tests are also used in paternity testing. In paternity tests it is essential to obtain data about human DNA. Since both PCR tests for corona diseases and paternity tests are PCR tests, it could theoretically be possible to obtain (personalized) data about DNA in PCR tests for corona diseases.
Whether this will be realized in practice, however, still needs to be researched. Which might be very difficult.
(c)saradinatechnik.de.tl | | | |
|
Bad #experiences with #church #religion
saradina-info-blog on 25.01.2022 um 14:30 (UTC) |
| | Actually, the early religious instruction in the first school classes should open a way to religion and church.
For this purpose, specially authorized persons are hired by the official church to give religious instruction.
But, as is so often the case, the Church proves to be less spiritual and even hateful. In one particular case, a religious teacher authorized by the Church deeply amazed an entire school class with his peculiar pedagogy in the first lesson.
First, the pastor began the lesson in a very skilful way. He chose the topic pets and asked the children whether they lived with their family or with acquaintances pets in the household.
Of course, the children were immediately on fire and told about their grandma's budgie, their uncle's dog and their own golden hamster.
But the longer the children talked about their pets with happy faces, the more evil the face of the blessed pastor became.
Then the priest became very unfriendly and began to scold the children. "Animals are machines. All the cute canaries and guinea pigs and cats are nothing but machines!"
And the message of "religious instruction" continued with the "information" that the children are on a religiously bad path if they love their cats and budgerigars. He even spoke of the children leaving the "way of God." The children would have to choose between God and the pets.
The children became very quiet from one second to the next. No one said anything, but the children's looks said it all. At that time it was a very good and well-behaved school class of six-year-old children, for whom teachers and pastors were a great authority.
But despite the silence, none of the children have stopped loving their pets. Rather, it was in this first religious lesson for about twenty-five six-year-old children that the first step towards leaving the Church had begun.
(c)saradinatechnik.de.tl | | | |
|
All people are related – but not necessarily #families
saradina-info-blog on 12.01.2022 um 14:41 (UTC) |
| | Many genealogists take pride in their long and carefully maintained family trees. You can list the names of family members who have died long ago, know who married whom, know the names of the children and, again, their spouses and their descendants.
These genealogists feel fortunate because they believe they know their roots and perceive their own ephemeral biography in a continuous stream of a long line of ancestors.
But how reliable are these family trees? Are these people, whose names can be read in a family history, really biologically related to one another? One can doubt.
It is forgotten that reality can sometimes be different and that some children have arisen out of marriage. As a result, some siblings are half-siblings and there are different lines even where you don’t suspect it.
This unpredictability shows the difficulty of gaining precise knowledge of ancestry. Who is who, who comes from where?
So the maternal line remains the only certainty and family trees primarily show a sequence of “social families”, that is, of people who have lived their lives in family relationships, regardless of lineage.
Even if family trees do not always provide the desired information on the question of one’s own family ancestry, one thing is clear. Biologically speaking, we humans are all one big family. Maybe we should get on a little better with each other.
(c)saradinatechnik.de.tl | | | |
|
